tobefree

January 27, 2012

Joel Skousen: Evidence of South Carolina Vote Tampering — “For Newt Gingrich to go from a 15% rating in South Carolina to winning 40% of the vote took much more than manipulated polling. There had to be electronic vote manipulation on a large scale.”

Joel discusses this with Dr. Stanley Monteith
on Radio Liberty, 1/26/11, hour 1

Listen Here

* * *

World Affairs Brief, January 27, 2012 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)

THIS WEEK’S ANALYSIS:

Evidence of South Carolina Vote Tampering

Is Gingrich the New Frontrunner?

Watch Out for Jeb Bush

Obama’s State of the Union

Space Code Leading to Weapons-Free Space

TSA Detains a Senator

More Internet Censorship Proposed

Davos Gloom

Why Gas Prices aren’t Coming Down

EVIDENCE OF SOUTH CAROLINA VOTE TAMPERING

For Newt Gingrich to go from a 15% rating in South Carolina to winning 40% of the vote took much more than manipulated polling. There had to be electronic vote manipulation on a large scale. While no whistleblower has come forth there is the telling evidence that all authorized vote tally watchers were blocked from being in the actual room to observe the vote tally. They were relegated to watching it on a television or behind a soundproof glass wall. Why the secrecy?

More and more states are starting to seal off the tally rooms so that no one can hear any conversations going on. The law in South Carolina requires that the vote tallying be done in public. Isolating tally watchers from hearing the proceedings is a violation of that process. Of course, then there’s the fact that the final tally is being done out of state, where no one can see if the tally is being changed. Conveniently, this tactic allows local politicians to escape blame if vote fraud is found. Brandon Tubeville of the Activist Post provides some of the evidence we have up to this point.

“After Newt Gingrich’s stunning victory [because of the unbelievable change in the voter’s choices] in the South Carolina Republican primaries on Saturday, there are now questions surrounding the vote counting process that took place Saturday night. Indeed, some individuals who witnessed the actual certification of the vote are beginning to question whether or not the outcome is a result of clever campaigning, or that of voter fraud.

“Although no one is pointing fingers at the Gingrich campaign, or any other campaign at this point [that is because the PTB are the ones who pull the strings and control election machinery at the state and national level], the anomalies that are arising from the accounts of eyewitnesses call into question the certainty and the credibility of the final count in South Carolina.

“At this time, the most serious questions are centered around the precincts in Pickens County.

[…]

January 25, 2012

[video] Fox Attempts to Discredit Ron Paul with OKC Inside Job Newsletter

Filed under: FOX News is SPIN Central,Ron Paul • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 8:20 pm

Fox Attempts to Discredit Ron Paul with OKC Inside Job Newsletter 1/2

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2012

Related:

Brigadier General Ben Partin: The Oklahoma City Bombing

[12-minute audio] O’Reilly Tries to Tie Child Molestation to Ron Paul, Doyle Fires Back ‘I Have the Dirt on O’Reilly’

Filed under: FOX News is SPIN Central,Media Bias Exposed,Ron Paul • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 7:15 am

From: libertypulse.com…

Bill O’Reilly hits a new low with his latest attack on Ron Paul. Thanks to Jerry Doyle for bringing to light an amazing attempt by O’Reilly to attached the Joe Paterno sex abuse scandal and Ron Paul’s fight to end the war on drugs. O’Reilly has stepped over the line once again and is sure to receive some more massive Blowback from Paul supporters.

Meanwhile the plot thickens, during Jerry Doyle’s show he exposes some unsavory behind the scenes shakedown attempts by Fox News, Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly. They called Doyle and threatened to find a way to take him down after his endorsement of Ron Paul. Doyle wasn’t phased by this and he came out today saying that he has dirt on Bill O’Reilly, he has the names and the places?

Folks, all I can say is that this is getting really interesting. What does Jerry Doyle know about Bill O’Reilly?

* * *

O’Reilly Tries to Tie Child Molestation to Ron Paul, Doyle Fires Back ‘I Have the Dirt on O’Reilly’

Uploaded by on Jan 24, 2012

The Showdown begins to heat up between Doyle and O’Reilly as Doyle shows that O’Reilly tries to connect Ron Paul to child molestation in American. Jerry Doyle exposes threats made to him after his endorsement of Ron Paul by Fox News in behalf of Bill O’Reilly. Doyle respond ‘I have the dirt on Bill O’Reilly’.

Related:

Jack Hunter Joins Jerry Doyle Show Says Bill O’Reilly is Completely Disgusting and Dishonest

Meet the real Bill O’Reilly: ‘Fair’ly un’Balanced’ and Fairly Disgusting: O’Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit — Female coworker details lewd behavior of Fox News star

[Satire] Newt Gingrich: Family Values

From: Rense.com

[video] Super Sweet Polar Bear Mom and Cubs!!!

Filed under: FUN–or–AMAZING Stuff! — Jeff Fenske @ 5:37 am

I couldn’t just post this on my Facebook page.

– –

polar bear female with cubs… ( Polar bears video )

Uploaded by on Aug 31, 2011

Hi I hope you like my Polar Bears ….. Bettan .

[video] Alex Jones: Military Industrial Complex has declared war on the US

Filed under: Police State • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 1:29 am

Alex Jones: Military Industrial Complex has declared war on the US

Uploaded by on Jan 19, 2012

Next month the Federal Aviation Administration will be proposing new rules to make it easier for law enforcement agencies to have permission to use predator drones on American citizens. In the past decade the Pentagon’s unmanned predator drones went from 50 to 7,000. Many fear the use of these drones on Americans are infringing on their civil liberties. Alex Jones, radio show host, joins us to look deeper into why predator drones are flying domestically.

January 23, 2012

[video] Newt Gingrich mentions “Homeland Security” 5 Days After 9/11 — But we were all told by the media that “Homeland Security” was born out of the ashes of 9/11!

Newt Gingrich mentions “Homeland Security” 5 Days After 9/11 ?!?!

Uploaded by on Dec 1, 2011

Absolute proof that “Homeland Security” was devised PRIOR to 9/11. But we were all told by the media that “Homeland Security” was born out of the ashes of 9/11. Yet another 9/11 LIE !!!

Romney Supporters Paid to be Romney Supporters

Filed under: Mitt Romney • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 11:10 pm

Romney Supporters Paid to be Romney Supporters

Uploaded by on Jan 22, 2012

Read the corresponding article for this vid at: http://www.redpillphilosophy.com/red-pill-forums.html#/20120123/2-fake-suppor…

On camera, a Romney “supporter” at an early voting location says he was paid by the South Florida Romney campaign effort to wear a shirt and maintain a presence. Having a handful of Romney supporters at the site likely helped make the impression on potential voters who lack the capacity to think for themselves that they, because of Romney’s large “support”, they should vote for him. Makes perfect sense…

[ audio ] Ray McGovern: CIA/Mossad covert ops thwarted the nuclear safeguard Iran was implementing. — Once again, America is creating the best enemies money can buy!

Gets good at the end of part 1

A Betrayal of The Founders 1/3

Uploaded by on Jan 17, 2012

On the Tuesday, January 17 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks with retired CIA officer and founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, Ray McGovern, about Israel and the coming war with Iran. McGovern delivered daily security briefs for Reagan, Vice President George H.W. Bush, the National Security Advisor, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Cabinet.
http://raymondmcgovern.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

By Ray McGovern

President Barack Obama desecrated the Constitution that he and I swore to defend when he signed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, which includes language violating the Bill of Rights and other constitutionally protected liberties.

The NDAA affirms that the president has the authority to use the Armed Forces to detain any person “who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.”

George Washington crossing the Delaware, in Emanuel Leutze’s iconic (though historically inaccurate) painting
Under the law, the president also may lock up anyone who commits a “belligerent act” against the U.S. or its coalition allies “without trial, until the end of the hostilities.” The law embraces the notion that the U.S. military can be used even domestically to arrest an American citizen or anyone else who falls under such suspicion — and it is “suspicion” because a trial can be avoided indefinitely.

Yes, I know that the Obama administration’s allies got some wording put in to say that “nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the [2001] Authorization for Use of Military Force,” nor shall the NDAA “be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.”

And there were some waivers stuck in to give the president discretion over whether to send someone into the gulag of the Military Commissions system possibly for the rest of a detainee’s life, given the indefinite nature of what was formerly called the “war on terror” and what the Pentagon has dubbed the Long War.

It’s true as well that after signing the NDAA on New Year’s Eve, President Obama engaged in some handwringing. He expressed “serious reservations” about some of the law’s provisions and declared, “I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens.” He added that he would interpret the law “in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.”

But those who hoped that Barack Obama, the onetime constitutional law professor, would begin rolling back the aggressive assault on civil liberties that President George W. Bush began after the 9/11 attacks must be sorely disappointed.

Those existing laws — including the original post-9/11 use-of-military-force authorization and the Military Commissions Act passed in 2006 and modified in 2009 — opened the door for presidents to declare anyone of their choice, American citizen or non-citizen alike, an “enemy combatant” and to subject the person to military prison or even assassination.

Just think of U.S. citizens Jose Padilla (who was tossed into the Navy Brig in Charleston, South Carolina, for years) and Anwar al-Awlaki (who was murdered in a drone attack in Yemen in 2011). So, it’s not especially reassuring that President Obama insists that the new law doesn’t dramatically worsen the decade-long erosion of constitutional rights.

Related:

Defense Secretary Panetta admits Iran NOT developing nukes: “Are they trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.” — And they call Ron Paul’s foreign policy ‘insane’ while they pressure Iran with sanctions that could cut off all middle east oil!

Oliver Stone on Ron Paul: “The most interesting candidate. I’d even vote for him if he was running against Obama. … He’s the only one of anybody who’s saying anything intelligent about the future of the world.”

Filed under: People • ToBeFree,Ron Paul • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 9:49 pm

From: rockcellarmagazine

Director Oliver Stone On History. And America, Jim Morrison & Ron Paul.
An Exclusive Interview

JANUARY 2012 BY ED RAMPELL

RCM:  In Our History you ask if there’s “a potential wild card in an internal economic collapse of the empire”? Is America an empire? And if so, do you foresee the fall of the empire?

OS:  Yes.  Yes, both.   I don’t think it’s a wild card, I think it’s a given. There’s no way that we can continue this spending spree.  In fact, I think in many ways the most interesting candidate – I’d even vote for him if he was running against Obama – is Ron Paul.  Because he’s the only one of anybody who’s saying anything intelligent about the future of the world.

How do we go on being who we are? We have an identity crisis here.  But as long as we keep running this fantasy through our minds that we can dominate history, it’s not a wild card, it’s a given!

[…]

So you tell me, what have we learned?  Or who’s faking, or who’s kidding who?  Why is it necessary for every candidate – except for Ron Paul – to pay obeisance to this hypocrisy that the U.S. is a good force in the world, and that it is the dominant force, and can be the policeman of the world?  Since when?  What gave us that right?  The right of empire, the right of force?

Entire Article Here

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers