To me, Saturday night’s 9/11 Debate on Coast to Coast AM was disgusting. It was a stacked deck.
Coast to Coast Am’s Saturday host, Ian Punnett sided with the official-9/11-story physicist, Dave Thomas, ganging up on Richard Gage, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. And this continued throughout the four hour supposed debate.
I should have known better than to think that Ian Punnett would give Richard Gage a fair shot, for it was Ian who previously took Coast to Coast to what I’ve so far considered its lowest low, especially in that he’s a seminary graduate. Ian is proving more and more to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing, and that’s what corporate media wants:
‘Theologian’*-host, Ian Punnett leads the world astray
From: Coast to Coast AM
…medium Christian von Lähr channeled the King of Pop, who delivered his final message from beyond and answered callers’ questions.
* Punnett has a Masters of Divinity degree from Columbia Theological Seminary in Atlanta, and has been ordained a Deacon in the Episcopal Church.
In this debate, Punnett/Thomas verses Gage, Ian played the Devil’s advocate throughout with Gage, while accepting everything Thomas said, no matter how absurd, including this:
For example, in the second tower that was hit, the WTC tower that collapsed first, most of the jet fuel burned in a mushroom cloud outside of the building. Dave Thomas then admitted that the jet fuel burned in the building for only about 10 minutes. But he said it had ignited paper, filing cabinet and office items which then heated the steel sufficiently to bring the entire tower down; though, this was the first steel building to collapse from fire in history!
Ian just let this go, staying in his Devil’s advocate shoes.
His recap appears more balanced (hopefully, Ian felt badly after the debate, having played his part in betraying America):
Gage believes the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition involving thermite. “I think the dust of the World Trade Center reveals the secret of the cause that we’re all looking for,” he said. The dust contained billions of tiny spheres (about the diameter of a human hair) of previously molten iron, Gage revealed. This means the iron in the spheres sustained temperatures exceeding 2800 degrees, twice as high as what a jet fuel fire can produce, but within the range of a thermite reaction, he noted. In addition, Gage said the dust contained hundreds of small red-gray chips, which he identified as highly-refined nano-thermite composite explosive material.
Thomas expressed his support for the gravitational collapse model. As the planes slammed into the twin towers, they cut through steel support structures and ignited immense fires across the floors of the building, he said. Heat from the fires further weakened the floor trusses, causing them to sag and pull in the perimeter walls, he continued.
Since when are police rescue dogs trained to sniff for thermite (what the super-duper guest stated and Ian just let it go)? I can’t find it: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22police+dogs%22+thermite+-termite+-termites. Nano, United-States-Department-of-Defense-grade thermite isn’t probably even on the terrorist watch list.
Ian even brings this up in his recap:
Johnson called attention to the fact that none of the hundreds of dogs used to locate survivors, many of them cross-trained to find explosives, detected any trace of thermite at the 9/11 disaster site.
So I’m disappointed with Ian. This could have been a great moment in US history, considering that fair treatment of the subject is almost entirely missing in mainstream media.
I’m sorry that I steered anyone wrongly in encouraging them to spend their time listening. I had my hopes up because George Noory’s ‘Coast to Coast’ interview was excellent. It’s linked below, and I highly suggest listening to it.
It would be interesting to know what Ian’s agenda is, and even maybe what his marching orders are.
Related:
Architect Richard Gage on Coast To Coast AM June 9, 2009 — ‘Elevator World’ March 2001 documents the largest elevator modernization project in the world going on nine months prior to 9/11.
Audio of this debate: Coast to Coast AM 9/11 debate with Richard Gage and Dave Thomas
Top architect explains why 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and Al Qaeda didn’t have the technology or access to do it. Who did? Two months before the ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION PROJECT, Nick ROCKEFELLER predicted a 9/11-like event to trigger war!
All 125 of my 9/11 TRUTH posts