(vid) Luke Rudkowski EXPOSED – Blames Saudi Arabia, like Alex – Never Talmudic Israel

Luke does some excellent work, which I’ll still post, but this is serious, and has long disturbed me.

– –

Continue reading “(vid) Luke Rudkowski EXPOSED – Blames Saudi Arabia, like Alex – Never Talmudic Israel”

(vid) Live at Berkeley Milo Yiannopoulos Protest – Luke Rudkowski

I only watched a few portions. It looks like the event happened this time, and the police kept the peace. Sad to see the security measures needing to be this extreme.

– –

In this video, Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange gives you the latest breaking news on the Milo Yiannopoulos Berkeley free speech week event that just happened and of course, there were protests. We also gave you interviews with people like Sargon of Akkad, based stickman and many others.

• • •

Continue reading “(vid) Live at Berkeley Milo Yiannopoulos Protest – Luke Rudkowski”

Rand Paul: Health Bill a ‘Fake Repeal’ – “I’m not willing to be bribed” • Doesn’t resent Trump’s tweets against him: “I’m a big boy and willing to go back and forth with the president”

Rand Paul: GOP’s ‘Fake Repeal’ Health Bill Is Setting Up a ‘Perpetual Food Fight’

(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump used Twitter Friday to slam Sen. Rand Paul and other Republicans who might oppose the GOP’s last-gasp effort to topple the Obama health care law. …

It was Trump’s second attack in three days on Paul, R-Ky., for so far being the only GOP senator to say he’ll vote against the bill….

In an interview with The Associated Press, Paul said the measure was “fake repeal” because it would leave in place most of the near $1 trillion in taxes President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul imposed to finance its expansion of coverage. He said all the bill does is set up a “perpetual food fight” over how that money is distributed to states.

The White House “just wants a legislative victory, they’re not as concerned with the policy,” Paul said. …

“I’m not willing to be bribed or do any kind of quid pro quo,” he said.

Paul, who was a Trump rival for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, said he doesn’t resent Trump’s tweets against him.

“I’m a big boy and willing to go back and forth with the president,” he said.

Full Story

Only one real holocaust in WWII: Churchill schemed the firebombing of 1 million German civilians — controlled by his Talmudic handlers!

Also, most people don’t understand what the Talmudic Jews were doing to Germany: 

“When the Jews declared war on Germany…

That didn’t justify putting Jews and others into the *work* camps, but the USA also did that to the Japanese.

And hardly any know that in the last 2,000 years, the Talmudic Jews had been run out of countries *about 100 times*, because of their Talmudic agenda to control and destroy countries, including making them decadent.

Since Hitler had no extermination plan — the gas chambers were faked — this event wasn’t that much different to what had been done to the Talmudists about 100 times — except we destroyed Germany’s infrastructure, so the supply lines to the camps were impassable. The camps ran out of food and medical materials. About 200,000 Talmudists died from Typhus and starvation as a result.

So in reality, US and British pilots and especially those who gave the orders [Talmudists controlled Churchill and FDR] were more responsible for the few hundreds of thousands that died than the Germans. The 6 million number was a lie.

If we’re to look at what really happened during WW II — instead of believing the propaganda on TalmudVision (TV).

Few also know that Hitler did not have a world-domination policy, and had offered peace plans to England over twenty times, which Churchill completely ignored.

Led by his Talmudic controllers, Churchill also began the true Holocaust of WWII, in which British pilots murdered and often incinerated 1 million German civilians with the planes they specifically had built to murder civilians. Germany had no such planes, and didn’t attempt to respond in kind until Hitler could see that Churchill would not stop for any reason. This didn’t justify Germany eventually trying to do the same. Few Brits were killed in comparison to the 1 million Germans.

TalmudVision only shows Germans bombing England, including the later developed and scary V2 rocket — and hardly mentions what the Allies did to Germany most German cities, with Dresden being the worst — which the US participated in, as well as other Holocausting bombing runs later in the war.

jeff

– –

Continue reading “Only one real holocaust in WWII: Churchill schemed the firebombing of 1 million German civilians — controlled by his Talmudic handlers!”

PDD 60: Abandonment of “Launch on Warning” — US policy to “Retaliate after Absorbing a First-strike” is an unwinnable policy that does more to invite attack than deter it

PDD 60: Abandonment of “Launch on Warning”

In 1997, President Bill Clinton issued Presidential decision directive (PDD) 60.  This directive radically changed US stratigic nuclear policy from “launch on warning” to “retaliate after absorbing a first strike”.  President Clinton’s justification for this change was based on the false premise that in the so-called “Post-Cold War Era”, Russia and China are no longer nuclear threats.

Robert Bell, senior director for defense policy and arms control at the National Security Council, verified information about PDD 60 in an interview on December 23, 1997.  Bell pointed out that while the United States has always had the “technical capability” to implement a policy of launch on warning, it has chosen not to do so. “Our policy is to confirm that we are under nuclear attack with actual detonations before retaliating”.

Hello? Are you serious? The whole strategy that makes nuclear weapons a deterrent is that under a “launch on warning” policy, whichever nation launches first looses and whichever nation launches second wins.  If you take US nuclear missiles off “launch on warning” and switch to a policy of “retaliation after absorbing a nuclear first-strike”, there won’t be anything left over to retaliate with.  You loose.  Especially since 1. most all US nukes are sitting in vulnerable fixed silos, and 2. the US has been unilaterally downsizing our nuclear arsenal.

“Launch on Warning” means the US would launch its nuclear missiles after it has been varified that a country like Russia and China have premptively launched on the US but before enemy warheads have arrived. Under “Launch on Warning” the US would retaliate while the enemy ICBMs are still in the air, and before they have detonated in the US.

The reason  “Launch on Warning” assures that whomever launches first looses and whomever launches second wins is that a country would likely only launch 50% of its nukes during a first-strike.  Most of the incoming nukes will be targeting our nukes here in the US to prevent a retaliatory counter-attack. However, how “Launch on Warning” works is the launch-second country can simply track the incoming ICBMs and predict which silos are being targeted.  The US would then launch the nukes only in those targeted silos.  The “launch on warning” ICBMs would then target the remaining unlaunched ICBMs back in the attacking nation.  When Russia’s ICBMs arrive, those nukes strike empty silos.  When the US nukes arrive on the other end, they target and destroy remaining ICBMs in Russia.

If the US only uses 50% of its nukes to target the remaining Russian nukes, then the US is left with 50% remaining ICBMs and Russia is left with 0% ICBMs.  This is how the “Launch on Warning” strategy assures that whomever initiates a nuclear firstrike looses and why the “Launch on Warning” policy is the only real and effective nuclear deterrence policy.

The new and current nuclear policy to “Retaliate after Absorbing a First-strike” is an unwinnable policy that does more to invite attack than deter it.

Unfortunately the only thing the public thinks it knows about nuclear stragedy is from the movie “War Games” which equates Global Thermonuclear War with a game of tick-tack-toe.

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_11-12/pdd

(source)

(vid) Ron Paul: Trump UN Speech Was “Neocon Heaven” 😈 — Paul minimizes the greatest threat to America though

I love Ron Paul — having 900 Ron Paul posts here!! But Joel Skousen would completely disagree with what Ron says @ 12:02:

“The invasion by a foreign power to destroy our liberty is not going to come in our lifetime.”

Joel shows how Russia/China will be completely ready by about 2023, but they could do it sooner. They’ll probably EMP US, and nuke only the military bases, which are EMP hardened, according to Joel. Many have had dreams of Russia and/or China nuking US too.

Joel has been against all of our reverse-Christian wars. This time though, he actually believes we should take out North Korea’s ability to attack US while we still have the chance, before Russia and China can use North Korea as the “trigger” and excuse to then bomb, bomb, bomb America.

Amazingly, Joel has been saying for many years that North Korea will be the globalists’ trigger, the perfect excuse for Russia and China to then take US out, after we attack Korea.

I don’t like the idea of preemptive war myself. We do have anti-missile missiles that can take out North Korea’s. Couldn’t that be good enough to protect US?

Russia and China’s nukes are maneuverable though, so we cannot stop them. They have state-of-the art everything, while we’re sitting ducks doing almost nothing to defend US.

It seems to me that protecting our power grid from an EMP should be our top priority, which could postpone the coming invasion. The cost has been said to only be the price of one stealth bomber, about $2 billion, which is peanuts.

Even a strong magnetic storm on the sun could take out our power for about a year. 90% of all Americans would die, the experts predict.

The media ignores this, and hardly any of the truthers even talk about hardening the grid (including Joel, surprisingly), which is probably our #1 threat, and would be easy and inexpensive to fix.

How can Ron Paul say an invasion is not going to happen in our lifetime, perhaps because he’s 82? Ron is so awesome, but I don’t know how he can be so ignorant of Russia and China’s preparations to take US out so overwhelmingly, that we may not even respond at all — due to PDD 60 especially, which Trump could rescind with the stoke of his pen.

PDD 60: Abandonment of “Launch on Warning” — US policy to “Retaliate after Absorbing a First-strike” is an unwinnable policy that does more to invite attack than deter it

Power to the Peaceful!

‘Christians’ in America should have humbly hit the floor on their knees long ago, following the HOLY Spirit instead of FOX News, the war channel.

Instead, most evangelicals continue to support the Zionist neocon, power-over-others agenda without ever admitting they were wrong, helping to take out the countries that would oppose the one-world government, including US.

What we’ve been doing to others will happen to US!

We even nuked Japan while they were trying to surrender. FDR baited Japan to invade Pearl Harbor with the 8-step, covert plan, proven by James Perloff, who shows that virtually all of our wars were immoral, and have been false flag driven.

We can’t continue to be cold hearted and not suffer the consequences — as America falls into decadence. Only people of high moral character can keep a nation strong to survive.

Much of the world now sees the US as the bully, and will cheer when Russia and China take US out, sadly.

Jeff

– –

Continue reading “(vid) Ron Paul: Trump UN Speech Was “Neocon Heaven” 😈 — Paul minimizes the greatest threat to America though”

(HD video sit-down interview) Christopher Bollyn: The Man Who Solved 9/11 – Israelis Involved

1:13:00 “Can you name me the top three people you think were involved with planning 9/11?”

• • •

Continue reading “(HD video sit-down interview) Christopher Bollyn: The Man Who Solved 9/11 – Israelis Involved”