May 30, 2016

(video) Adolf Hitler & The German Economic Miracle — “Crashing threw the lies to help build a better tomorrow. Face it we have been lied to. The man who fought the banks”

The video starts in America, showing how the banksters intentionally created a false bank run in 1907 to bring in the unconstitutional, private, ‘Federal’ Reserve Bank in 1913 — after which they crashed the economy, resulting in The Great Depression.

The Talmudists also created chaos in Germany, starting with what they did during and after WWI (millions died), as well as the extreme decadence [one of the photos is risqué – WARNING].

This is part of the true story that is probably not taught in any of the public schools in America.

– –

Adolf Hitler & The German Economic Miracle

Politically Incorrect

Differences in Physical Ability in Men & Women — Measurable sex differences in strength, speed, resilience and endurance as well as in motor control, precision and complexity can largely explain male dominance in occupational settings which rely on these traits

Filed under: The Purpose of Feminism — Jeff Fenske @ 7:32 am

Since the media and education consistently put down men and elevate women to destroy families and western civilization, this is the first time I recall ever seeing an article specifically showing these differences which female power and the globalists don’t want people to know.

– –


Sex Differences in Physical Ability

The most obvious difference between men and women is their physique, which translates to very large differences in physical prowess. A 2010 review by anthropologist David Puts has captured these differences.[1]

Men are larger, stronger, faster, and more physically aggressive than women – and the degree of sexual dimorphism in these traits rivals that of species with intense male contests.

Sex differences in stature is relatively modest with men being about 10% bigger with 20% more body mass.[2] However, these seemingly modest figures greatly underestimate the magnitude of sex differences in strength and speed, partly because women are unique among primates in having copious fat stores.[3]

When fat-free mass is considered, men are 40% heavier and have 60% more total lean muscle mass than women. Men have 80% greater arm muscle mass and 50% more lower-body muscle mass. Men have about 90% greater upper-body strength and about 65% greater lower-body strength: the average man is stronger than 99.9% of women. In terms of anaerobic power, men have over 45% higher vertical leap and over 25% faster sprint times.[4][5][6] Sex differences in anaerobic sprint speeds are not narrowing and some data suggest that the gap may have widened in the last decade.[7][8]  […]

Sex Differences in Psychomotor Ability

The full range of sex differences in physical prowess go beyond strength and speed, into the realm of psychomotor abilities. Psychomotor abilities refer to skills that arise from brain–body coordination. […]


Measurable sex differences in strength, speed, resilience and endurance as well as in motor control, precision and complexity can largely explain male dominance in occupational settings which rely on these traits.

Full Article


“(video) Freud, Zionism and Sexual Revolution: Resentment against Christ and Gentiles is a motivating factor in promoting sexual degeneration and pornography

Scientists: WOMEN better at MULTI-TASKING, MEN better at CONCENTRATING on SINGLE Complex TASKS; Women have better connections between the LEFT & RIGHT sides of the brain • Men have better connections between the FRONT & BACK — ‘COMPLEMENTARY’ PROVEN!

New Study: The hardwired ‘stark’ difference between male and female brains explains why women rely more on intuition — “It’s quite striking how COMPLEMENTARY the brains of women and men really are.” | God knew what He was doing : )

Adrian Rogers on MEN and WOMEN: Celebrate the Difference — “God made us different that He might make us ONE.” It’s time to stop trying to be the be the same or resenting each other because of our differences.

Satanists used “sexual liberation,” to undermine humanity: “we corrupt in order to conquer” — For a woman, sex is an act of self-sacrifice and surrender. By definition, it requires trust, i.e. love and devotion to one man. When she has casual sex, inevitably she is disappointed and feels used. She starts to hate men and falls victim to feminism and lesbianism

How The Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women — The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young

(video) Feminism Was Created To Destabilize Society, Tax Women and Set Up the NWO – Aaron Russo

The Purpose of Feminism articles at ToBeFree

May 28, 2016

(video) Germar Rudolf exposes Auschwitz’s Curated Lies (PowerPoint) — Part 1: How the Auschwitz Museum dupes millions of visitors • Part 2: How the Auschwitz Museum lies about documents in its archives


Germar Rudolf is the ‘Richard Gage’ of Holocaust truth!

The Jew’s extreme and completely blatant lying revealed here is explained by: “Talmud Encourages Jews to Deceive Non-Jews — “Pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred” — Talmud denies the Gentile status as a “man,” so they are also excluded from being the Jews’ neighbor

– –

Germar Rudolf exposes Auschwitz’s Curated Lies

Published on May 14, 2016

Holocaust Revisionist Germar Rudolf gives a presentation on the new Holocaust Handbook Curated Lies.

Support Revisionist research – Buy Curated Lies on Amazon –…

The new book by Carlo Mattogno exposes the Auschwitz museum’s misrepresentations, distortions, and deceptions.


(video) Auschwitz Truth – Ernst Zundel and David Cole

(video) Scientist Destroys Official Auschwitz Gas Chamber Claims – Germar Rudolf: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations & Deceptions — The Real Deal Ep #198 Curated Lies w/ Jim Fetzer


Germar Rudolf is the ‘Richard Gage’ of Holocaust truth!

The Jew’s extreme and completely blatant lying revealed here is explained by: “Talmud Encourages Jews to Deceive Non-Jews — “Pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred” — Talmud denies the Gentile status as a “man,” so they are also excluded from being the Jews’ neighbor

Exciting to see Jim Fetzer this interested! Germar’s audio does fade in and out, which doesn’t happen in his solo presentation of the same material here: (video) Germar Rudolf exposes Auschwitz’s Curated Lies (PowerPoint) — Part 1: How the Auschwitz Museum dupes millions of visitors • Part 2: How the Auschwitz Museum lies about documents in its archives

– –

Germar Rudolf Interviewed about New Holocaust Handbook Curated Lies

Published on May 20, 2016

Germar Rudolf is interviewed about the new Holocaust Handbook CURATED LIES: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations & Deceptions.…
Support Revisionist research – Buy Curated Lies on Amazon –

Holocaust Revisionist Germar Rudolf gives a presentation on the new Holocaust Handbook Curated Lies.

The new book by Carlo Mattogno exposes the Auschwitz museum’s misrepresentations, distortions, and deceptions.

Free PDF and Kindle Downloads at


(video) Auschwitz Truth – Ernst Zundel and David Cole


(video) The Treblinka Archaeology ‘Holocaust’ Hoax — TalmudVision’s (TV) documentary “Treblinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine” proven a fraud! — Includes many excerpts • FREE YOURSELF from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about “six million” Jews “gassed” in “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms”

Very well done and worth watching!!

Since the gas chambers in Auschwitz, Dachau and Majdanek are now proven fabrications, the Zionists are trying to find proof of the Holocaust elsewhere, but revisionists show they are only lies too.

Includes many excerpts of The Smithsonian Channel’s deceptive, propaganda film: Treblinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine.

The Smithsonian Channel is a joint venture by the U.S. government owned Smithsonian Institute and the CBS corporation, owned by Jewish billionaire Murray Rothstein.”

– –

The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax

CODOH - Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

CODOH – Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

Published on Nov 11, 2015

With subtitles in English, Deutsch, Español, Português.

Were 900,000 Jews “gassed” at Treblinka?

Were 3.9 million Jews “steamed to death” in “steam chambers” there, too, as the Allied victors asserted right after World War II during the Nuremberg trials?

The current official “Holocaust” story is that Treblinka 2 is the largest mass burial site in the entire world, where the Germans gassed 900,000 Jews in 13 “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms.”

“Holocaust Revisionists” or “Holocaust Deniers” assert that there is no evidence to support this claim, and tales of “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms” are wartime atrocity fiction ­­ similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades.

Between 2012 and 2014, British Archaeologist Dr. Caroline Sturdy Colls conducted investigations on the grounds of the former Treblinka camp with the intention to refute the Deniers’ claims once and for all. The results of her studies were prominently featured by TV documentaries in both the UK and the US.

In “The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax,” US filmmaker Eric Hunt expertly analyzes Dr. Sturdy Colls’ investigations and exposes them as a massive fraud. For instance, her research actually included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new “hidden mass graves”; she also falsely assigned homicidal intent to a normal life-saving bath and disinfection complex at the entrance to the Majdanek concentration camp, and misidentified a terracotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.”

Free yourself from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about “Six Million” Jews “gassed” in “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms”

Watch it!


See also this movie’s web page on Eric Hunt’s home page at!

A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust by Hadding Scott — No written evidence of eastern ‘death’ camps, proven

The emotion-not-science film Eric Hunt critiques above: Treblinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine | Smithsonian Channel

(video) 10 Hard Facts About the “Holocaust” in 6 Minutes!

Illuminati “Sex Goddess” Programming — We are programmed to be sex addicts by the satanists who control the mass media • The Illuminati empower women in order to emasculate men and neuter both sexes • Modern Judaism is secret society defined by Cabalism (a satanic sex cult) and the Talmud (characterized by incest and pedophilia as well as hatred of non-Jews) • The lesson? This is a battle for the mind. If we don’t control our thoughts, they will

Henry Makow is a Jew warning us about TalmudVision’s (TV) intentional sex programming, and the Satanic cult behind it.

– –

From: Henry Makow

Illuminati “Sex Goddess” Programming

May 27, 2016

Every decade, certain movie stars epitomize sex appeal. These “sex symbols”
program men to think women represent transcendent spiritual ideals. By inflating female value in men’s minds, Hollywood sabotages the heterosexual dynamic which requires male dominance. As with feminism, the Illuminati empower women in order to emasculate men and neuter both sexes.

We are programmed to desire sex, but could be programmed to desire mystical experiences or to perform selfless acts instead. We desire what our Illuminati masters teach us to desire and are “happy” if we achieve it. Mental rather than spiritual beings, we are programmed to be sex addicts by the satanists who control the mass media. …

It seems the whole trajectory of the Twentieth Century was to make sex the primary focus and purpose of life. This is how satanic possession works. …

Even in the thirties and forties, Hollywood was a sexual cesspool. It’s a tragedy that these degenerates define reality for us. …


Why are Jews so obsessed with sex? Jews don’t know this but Judaism is not a religion. The Illuminati Jewish leadership supplants God, and degrades mankind to an animal state using sex. Whenever you deny God, you can create myriad false Gods including sex.

[Modern – ed.] Judaism is secret society like Freemasonry; only initiates know its true character. It is defined by Cabalism, a satanic sex cult, and the Talmud, which is characterized by incest and pedophilia as well as hatred of non-Jews. (Cabalism is satanic because it says God is formless and unknowable. The essence of religion is that God is knowable – how else can you obey Him?)

Due to Masonic Jewish control of banking, business, government, culture and communications, we have all become Jews. Western society is a satanic cult. Sex is the new God. “Sex goddesses” point the way. Porn may have blunted their power somewhat by demystifying the naked body.

The lesson? This is a battle for the mind. If we don’t control our thoughts, they will.

Entire Article

May 27, 2016

A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust by Hadding Scott — No written evidence of eastern ‘death’ camps, proven


This is beautiful, and very possibly the comprehensive, point-by-point article that will sink Irving’s false claim that exterminations happened in or near these eastern camps — the theory that Mark Weber and David Cole Stein have sadly also adopted.

Thank you very much for this important report, Hadding! There really is no evidence for any extermination plan or actions.

It’s sad to see David Irving so concerned about his own reputation and ability to produce income from writing that he’d sell out like this. I hope he finds his moral compass and admits his error.

I wrote on my Facebook post:

I just read most of this excellent 12 page report that DISPROVES the theory that claimed there was a partial Holocaust in the eastern camps, since the gas chamber MYTH in Auschwitz and Dachau has been settled.

One historian was desperately trying to save his career, and fabricated a story which has now been completely taken apart here.

There was no Holocaust — only work camps within hundreds of thousands of Jews died (not 6 million) due to starvation and Typhus near the end of the war, after we bombed the camps’ supply lines.

The Holocaust story was made up to demonize the Germans and victimize the Jews.

Hitler was following Martin Luther’s written ideas about expelling the Jews because of how many were trying to overthrow Germany.

I personally believe that only those responsible should have been put into the camps, but the main thing is that the ‘Holocaust’ as we know it absolutely did not happen, while the US and England actually did intentionally Holocaust to death about 1 million German civilians by fire bombing city center populations.

So there was a Holocaust during WWII, but not against the Jews.

– –


“Talking Frankly” about David Irving
A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust

By Hadding Scott

The following article is a critical analysis of some statements made by British historian David Irving in a “privately filmed interview” of April 2009 lasting over 2 hours, and entitled, “Talking Frankly.” Until early 2016, this interview was available only on DVD. It was posted on YouTube in March 2016. It can also be watched here:

I first became aware of David Irving about 1992 during the period (1988 – 1995) when he acquired the reputation of being a “notorious Holocaust Denier.” The David Irving of that time was an inspiring figure. He espoused the idealism of pursuing truth rather than profit. He was a fearless iconoclast. The fact that he was already a celebrity historian (for example having been discussed in Kurt Vonnegut’sSlaughterhouse Five as the author of the book about Dresden, and having appeared on Leonard Nimoy’sIn Search Of as an expert on Eva Braun) made his stand for the cause of Holocaust Revisionism all the more impressive. This was a man who had status and something to lose, who was nonetheless championing the most controversial of truths. The persona that David Irving projected in that period resonated with my own ideals and encouraged me to live up to them.

After his testimony for Ernst Zündel in 1988, David Irving seemed to be an intellectual hero in full self-actualization. He said in a 1988 speech that he knew that he had “joined the ranks of the damned” and that the next five to ten years would be difficult, but that he would persevere. David Irving’s stand for Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be an expression of his long-evident character as the historian who intended to correct the omissions and distortions of victors’ history. Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be consistent with the essence of David Irving, the logical next stage in the evolution of the heroic historian.

But in retrospect, with greater knowledge, one can see that David Irving’s truth-advocacy was never entirely free of hesitation. While David Irving seemed to be an uncompromising truthteller, one can just barely discern the influence of calculated self-interest and the moistened finger in the breeze, even in his most outspokenly controversial period. The seed of retreat was always there.

For example, in that 1988 speech, wherein David Irving proclaims that he is now an “unbeliever” in the Auschwitz gas-chamber story, and that the whole gas-chamber story is likely false, he balks at blaming Jews for the lie. Instead, he claims that British psychological warfare put out the gas-chamber story “quite cold-bloodedly” — although documents of the British government (visible on Irving’s own site) indicated that the British psychological warfare executive was repeating a story that came to them from Jews. I assume that David Irving unearthed all of his documents relating to this matter at about the same time, whence it follows that David Irving knew, when he said in 1988 that the British had invented the gas-chamber story, that it really came from Jews.

All of this points to a fear of the Jews that was never entirely overcome. Jewish power is, after all, a serious matter for a commercial author who depends on the Jewish-dominated publishing industry for his livelihood.

It seems that David Irving believed that he could minimize conflict with Jews by minimizing Jewish responsibility for the Holocaust-lie. During that 1988 speech, as Irving explains how Jews themselves are supposed victims of the lie, a man in the audience blurts out, “You’re very generous!” In 1988 David Irving was indeed generous in his assessment of the role of Jews in promoting the Holocaust, but that generosity did not save him from Jewish odium and organized Jewish harassment.

In 1996, when Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich appeared, it became clear that David Irving was in retreat, and trying to appease his enemies by writing a book that slammed a leading figure in Hitler’s Germany while showing sympathy toward Jews.

I heard a prominent Holocaust Revisionist at that time remark (privately) that David Irving had been accustomed to living the high life as a famous historian who drove a Rolls Royce, and, contrary to his professed idealism and professed willingness to sacrifice in pursuit of truth, David Irving had embraced Holocaust Revisionism with the expectation that it would be the next big thing in modern historiography, and that he would benefit from having gotten into it early – not realizing how adversely the Jewish backlash would affect his lifestyle and interfere with his career.

In other words, David Irving was never as idealistic as he professed to be. However impressive, however convincing and inspiring he seemed in the period from 1988 to 1995, David Irving was more heroic tenor than hero. This is clearer than ever today.

During the failed libel-suit against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books in 2000, Irving complained extensively about the pecuniary loss that he had suffered as a result of Jewish propaganda against him as a “Holocaust Denier.” With that suit he was trying to escape the label “Holocaust Denier,” and in 2016 he seems to be still trying.

These days, David Irving actually promotes the proposition that there really was some kind of Holocaust, and, although he has not retracted his endorsement of the Leuchter Report (which he himself republished in 1989), on the whole he is not only trying to distance himself from Holocaust Revisionism but indeed working against it.


Most of “Talking Frankly” is autobiographic, but in the final segment David Irving presents a revised version of the Holocaust that salvages as much of the genocide-accusation that can be salvaged without contradicting the Leuchter Report. There are three main elements here. The order in which he presents them reflects their importance in retreating from the quasi-heroic stand that he took in 1988. First he makes a partial retreat from his position on Auschwitz; then he asserts that many Jews were killed in the Operation Reinhardt camps; finally, he plays up an alleged mass-shooting of Jews that is supposed to have happened in 1941.


There are eight or nine documents to which Irving refers in his discussion of the Operation Reinhardt camps:

  1. an alleged letter from Heinrich Himmler ordering the demolition of Treblinka and the establishment of a farm on the site (putatively to disguise what had been happening there);
  2. Himmler’s letter to Heinrich Müller about “Jews dying like flies”;
  3. Himmler’s letter to Ernst-Robert Grawitz about the low rate of cancer-mortality in the camps;
  4. two inventories of confiscated valuables from 1942 and 1943;
  5. the Hoefle telegram;
  6. the Korherr Report;
  7. a letter from Himmler to Korherr instructing him on how to word the executive summary of the Korherr Report for Hitler;
  8. alleged memoirs of Adolf Eichmann.

[Hadding then critiques & dismisses Irving’s claims about these documents point by point – ed.]


What to say about David Irving?

…the more I checked his claims, the more I realized that any claim made by David Irving must be checked, because with incredible frequency he distorts the meanings of documents and invents episodes as needed to serve his ultimate purpose of creating an interesting story full of paradox, intrigue, and suspense – and lately, of escaping the label “Holocaust Denier.”

I do not dislike David Irving. I have to say that David Irving is an entertaining storyteller, and he has produced some interesting nuggets of information (some of which might even be true). As an expert on documents, he is awesome. He speaks in a compelling manner. But at this point I do not trust the man’s interpretations of anything. To the extent that what he says about the Holocaust in “Talking Frankly” may be presumed to represent his normal level of historical veracity, I would not rely on David Irving as a source of “real history.” He may not really be worse than mainstream historians, but he is far from being the heroic truthteller that he likes to portray, which I used to think he was.

Entire 12 Page Article Here


(video) The Treblinka Archaeology ‘Holocaust’ Hoax — TalmudVision’s (TV) documentary “Treblinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine” proven a fraud! — Includes many excerpts • FREE YOURSELF from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about “Six Million” Jews “gassed” in “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms”

(video) 10 Hard Facts About the “Holocaust” in 6 Minutes!


(video) MONSTER Energy drinks are the work of SATAN!!! — 666 in Hebrew • Upside Down Cross • “Unleash the Beast” • Owned by Talmudists

Filed under: Talmudic Anti-Christ "Jews" — Jeff Fenske @ 4:31 am

Who owns Monster?

Jewish Billionaire Rodney Sacks, whose sister Caron is married to Israeli politician Ze’ev Bielsk (source)

• • •

MONSTER Energy drinks are the work of SATAN!!!

May 26, 2016

(1-min video) Top 5 Facts About Israel’s New Defense Minister

Top 5 Facts About Israel’s New Defense Minister


May 24, 2016

What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers, 1933-1939 – Time to face the facts!

Filed under: Germany Real-History Truth,Real History • ToBeFree — Jeff Fenske @ 1:48 am

This audio interview at Spingola Speaks is even more amazing and comprehensive than the article linked below. Hitler tried many times (probably dozens) and in every way possible to offer peace to avoid war (before and during)!:

Mark R. Elsis

Mark R. Elsis, a web entrepreneur, writer, producer and director whose desire is to protect future generations joined Deanna this afternoon to talk about Hitler’s Peace Plans. (MP3)

– –

From: Justice4Germans

What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers, 1933-1939 – Time to face the facts!


Beginning well before 1939 and continuing right through to the present day, world opinion has been systematically manipulated to induce the false belief that Adolf Hitler was a power mad, despotic war monger and evil tyrant who had illegally seized power in Germany, sought war with his European neighbours, and had a plan to rule the world. The establishment “court historians” have maintained and perpetuated this propaganda narrative since 1945, while skilfully ignoring Hitler’s numerous well documented attempts to persuade the World War I Allies, through diplomatic means, to live up to their own commitments to disarm, and to work with him to bring about a just settlement of outstanding issues arising out of the Treaty of Versailles, which had severely crippled Germany (and consequently also the world economy) as well as, caused persistent growing tensions within Europe, were repeatedly rebuffed.

This article from 1940 by Dr. Friedrich Stieve provides an overview of Hitler’s various peace initiatives from the time he was first duly appointed as Chancellor in 1933 until war was declared on Germany in 1939.  It demonstrates clearly how these efforts at preserving world peace were thwarted by British, French, American and Russian war mongers and their string pullers, the International Bankers who had an entirely different agenda to which Hitler’s proposals and his model of National Socialism posed a huge threat.  Thus, they declared that “Hitler was a menace to the world and must be stopped!”,  employing atrocity propaganda, false quotes, or quotes taken out of context, and disinformation to propagate and perpetuate their own narrative, to incite nations to war, and to always shift the blame away from themselves. And of course, they also smeared those who supported Hitler or who at least, who found his foreign policy objectives not unreasonable, as “appeasers”.  Then, having succeeded in destroying Germany, they buried evidence which challenged their narrative, created false evidence, and tortured Germans into making false, self-incriminating confessions, etc to establish their (the victor’s) version of events as official history, and their war as completely justified and necessary; the so-called “good war”.

Since 1945, this false paradigm has been perpetually recycled as the proponents of the New World Order agenda  continue to brand all truly nationalistic leaders who serve their people (and not the Bankers)  as “the next Hitler” or as “Nazi like”, etc. and of course, those who support them are again labelled as “appeasers” or “cowards”,  or even as “terrorists”.  It is time for the world to wake up, face the facts, and recognize this ‘method of operations’, and to understand that it was first developed and used against Germany in World War I, and then refined and perfected in World War II into a hideous art form, with which they always drive the “sheeple” to do their bidding.


Published in 1940 by the Washington Journal under the auspices of the ‘Deutsche Informationsstelle’, by Dr. Friedrich Stieve  (Intro only)

Germany’s enemies maintain today that Adolf Hitler is the greatest disturber of peace known to history, that he threatens every nation with sudden attack and oppression, that he has created a terrible war machine in order to cause trouble and devastation all around him. At the same time they intentionally conceal an all-important fact: they themselves drove the Leader of the German people finally to draw the sword. They themselves compelled him to seek to obtain at last by the use of force that which he had been striving to gain by persuasion from the beginning: the security of his country. They did this not only by declaring war on him on September 3, 1939, but also by blocking step for step for seven years the path to any peaceful discussion.

The attempts repeatedly made by Adolf Hitler to induce the governments of other states to collaborate with him in a reconstruction of Europe resemble an ever-recurring pattern in his conduct since the commencement of his labors for the German Reich. But these attempts were wrecked every time by reason of the fact that nowhere was there any willingness to give them due consideration, because the evil spirit of the Great War still prevailed everywhere, because in London and Paris and in the capitals of the Western Powers’ vassal states there was only one fixed intention: to perpetuate the power of Versailles.

A rapid glance at the most important events will furnish incontrovertible proof for this statement.

When Adolf Hitler came to the fore, Germany was as gagged and as helpless as the victors of 1918 wanted her to be. Completely disarmed, with an army of only 100,000 men intended solely for police duties within the country, she found herself within a tightly closed ring of neighbors all armed to the teeth and leagued together. To the old enemies in the West, Britain, Belgium and France, new ones were artificially created and added in the East and the South: above all Poland and Czechoslovakia. A quarter of the population [2] of Germany were forcibly torn away from their mother country and handed over to foreign powers. The Reich, mutilated on all sides and robbed of every means of defense, at any moment could become the helpless victim of some rapacious neighbor.

Then it was that Adolf Hitler for the first time made his appeal to the common sense of the other powers. On May 17, 1933, a few months after his appointment to the office of Reichskanzler, he delivered a speech in the German Reichstag, from which we extract the following passages:

“Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness.

Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention.

Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security.”

No answer was received….   (please continue reading this fully sourced article with links below)



Hitler’s initiatives were all documented in the German White Book and the British Blue Book, and the official diplomatic records of other European states.

Entire Article


Hitler’s Peace Plans

Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess: A Courageous Hero For Peace

Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers

%d bloggers like this: