Just because the official 9/11 story has been proven false (see articles linked below) doesn’t mean a 757 did not hit the Pentagon, unless these parts were placed after the incident, which is certainly possible, considering the diabolical nature of the perpetrators.
When I worked for an airline, I verified this photo of the landing gear with actual 757 landing gear.
– –
From: 911research.wtc7.net
The Pentagon Attack:
What the Physical Evidence Shows
by
Jim Hoffman
Version 0.9, March 28, 2006
..In this essay I look exclusively at the physical evidence of the Pentagon attack — post-crash photographs and verifiable information about the building, the Boeing 757-200 aircraft, and the physics of aircraft crashes based on case studies. …
Swath of Downed Lamp Poles Fits a 757’s Wingspan
..Of the downed lamp poles whose condition was documented by photographs, all appear to exhibit similar types of damage: each was severed some distance from its base, and is bent in an arc in the direction of the shear over a much shorter distance. This pattern of damage appears to be consistent with the high-speed impact by the leading edges of wings. …
Landing Gear Parts Match a 757
Photographs of debris in the courtyard between B- and C-Rings show a damaged wheel hub surrounded by other apparent aircraft debris. Numerous features in the photographed part match rear wheel hubs of Boeing 757s — the aspect ratio, the shape and number of oval perforations, the bolts that lie just inside of the rim, and the double ridge in the edge of the rim. (The double ridge is visible in only about a tenth of the circumference of the damaged hub.)
A photograph of the Pentagon’s interior shows a metal object with a cylindrical shaft and structures on its end that were apparently formed connections to other parts. The part in the photograph has the same kinds of features as the main rear landing gear strut on similar Boeing jets such as 767s, and it may be an exact match for the strut of a 757.
Hull Piece Matches a 757 With American Airlines Colors
A scrap of aircraft photographed by Mark Faram on the lawn just north of the crash site has a color scheme matching an American Airlines jet: silver, white, and red.
Closer examination of the scrap and comparison of its decorations and rivet pattern with that of an American Airlines 757-200 suggests that it matches a section of the fuselage just aft of the starboard forward cabin door. If the red marking is a part of the ‘n’ in ‘American’, then the smooth edge on the rightmost end of the scrap appears to be in the correct position for the door opening — four rivet lines from the end of the ‘n’.
Based on this argument, implying that the piece could only have come from the forward right (starboard) side of a 757, some observers have noted peculiarities about the piece. How did it end up far to the left of the flight path? Why does it show no signs of abrasion or burning? Perhaps the argument is wrong, and the piece came from the aft left (port) side of a 757.
Entire Article with Photos Here
Related:
(video) POWERFUL 9/11 Documentary Airs on PBS Across Colorado!!!!!!!
Joel Skousen: Best Evidence – 9/11 attacks a government black operation from beginning to end
A PNAC Primer: How We Got Into This Mess
(video) Nick Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
(video) Psychologists Explain 911 Denial — Fear, Pride…. “We need the truth in order to heal.”
(video) Molten Steel Found at Ground Zero Weeks After 9/11
(video) 9/11 Masterminds – Explosive Connections
Swedish Structural Engineer: WTC Towers Did Not Collapse from Fire
All of my 9/11 truth posts in reverse chronological order (latest posts appear first, 10 posts per page)
