(video) Mike Adams: Google, Facebook and Twitter censorship pushing America toward CIVIL WAR

Google, Facebook and Twitter censorship pushing America toward CIVIL WAR

Published on Aug 15, 2017

The violence on America’s streets must end, and that means the overt censorship of all conservative voices by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter must also end. It is time to regulate internet gatekeepers and outlaw their politically-motivated censorship of conservative voices.

The echo chamber of the illogical, irrational and enraged Left is magnified by the selective censorship of internet gatekeepers like Google and Facebook, all of which are engaged in the most outrageous distortions and censorship imaginable, deliberately silencing all conservative voices while amplifying left-wing channels and news sources, no matter how dishonest or hypocritical they are. This is all part of a deliberate scheme to silence White people, conservatives, heterosexuals and Christians in order to favor lunatic left-wing culture that’s rooted in delusional thinking, anti-science “biology” and intense racism, bigotry and hatred toward anyone who doesn’t bow down to their totalitarianism.

(video) David Icke Dot-Connector: ‘MONSTERS Inc’ – Amazon, Google and Facebook — “A handful of corporations will control the flow of information….”

Where this is heading unless something is done:

“A handful of corporations will control the flow of information….”

– David Icke

• • •

Monsters Inc – Amazon, Google and Facebook – David Icke Dot-Connector

Published on Aug 11, 2017

Google – Straight out of Orwell’s 1984… — While you may think of all the links returned to you in a Google search as “information choices,” Google thinks of them as “bugs” that need to be eradicated from their system

While you may think of all the links returned to you in a Google search as “information choices,” Google thinks of them as “bugs” that need to be eradicated from their system. These new policies are the extermination squad. Now the search engine giant will be delisting and censoring content that doesn’t follow “well-established” scientific, medical, or historical “facts”. Remember 1984? There was a huge difference between “truth” — what actually is — and “facts” — what a consensus has been led to believe.

• • •

It’s Official: This Is Straight out of Orwell’s 1984…

Published on Aug 9, 2017

You can’t get a more literal interpretation. It’s 1984. Is anyone going to say anything? And if they do, will anyone hear us?

YouTube Will Censor Non-Rulebreaking Content, Manipulate Search Results, and Work with ADL

YouTube Will Censor Non-Rulebreaking Content, Manipulate Search Results, and Work with ADL

YouTube censored

Content creators on YouTube who follow all of the site’s rules may still face censorship by the platform, under new plans announced by Google.

According to a post on YouTube’s official blog, videos will now be subject to the rule of the mob. If enough users flag a video as “hate speech” or “violent extremism,” YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules.

We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes.

YouTube has also rolled out a “trusted flagger” program, in which 15 “expert NGOs and institutions” to help them identify hate speech and extremism on their platform.

Among these organizations are the No Hate Speech Movement, a left-wing project pushed by the Council of Europe, as well as the Anti-Defamation League, an organization whose president has been accused of “manufacturing outrage” by the World Jewish Congress.

YouTube is also planning to artificially alter its search results so that searches for “sensitive” topics on YouTube no longer return the most popular videos, but a “playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages.”

The platform also plans to artificially promote videos created via its “Creators for Change” program,  which, in YouTube’s words, features creators who are “using their voices and creativity to speak out against hate speech, xenophobia and extremism.”

Entire Article

US Government Leads the Way in Tackling ‘Anti-Semitism’ — 1st Amendment dying to protect a lie — A big reason why Amazon has pulled Revisionist books

From: CODOH

Government Leads the Way in Tackling Anti-Semitism

David Merlin

One of the big reasons that Amazon has pulled Revisionist books is that the government is taking fresh steps in the fight against hatred of Jews by formally adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism.

The new and greatly expanded definition on anti-Semitism reads as follows:

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, considering the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. · Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. Anti-Semitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of anti-Semitic materials in some countries). 

https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/sites/default/files/press_release_document_antisemitism.pdf

This is the bill that passed the Senate and is now before the House of Representatives.

And this is the State Department definition referred to in the bill.

Entire Article