Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth
Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth
Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth
John Perkins’ experience summarized in a 2-min. video:
The Economic Hitmen Awareness
“Does anyone believe that on the eve of peace talks, just after the White House said the Syrian people should choose their own leaders, that Assad would launch a gas attack to turn the whole world against him? We don’t either. We’re back to the same lies that got us into Iraq. Do we never learn to question the propaganda?”
– Ron Paul
• • •
The White Helmets, an al-Qaeda affiliated group funded by George Soros and the British government, have reportedly staged another chemical weapon attack on civilians in the Syrian city of Khan Shaykhun to lay blame on the Syrian government.
A day prior to the attack, Gulf-based Orient TV announced “Tomorrow we are launching a media campaign to cover the airstrikes on Hama country side including the usage of chemical warfare against civilians.” This shows clear foreknowledge that the rebels were going to stage an attack by Orient TV.
The White Helmets filmed much of the footage being released on the chemical attack. They have also been known to stage “rescue” videos in the past. However, this time it appears children were indeed killed in the making of this “media campaign.”
Several children appear in the videos suffocating from an unknown chemical substance, while others appear to have unexplained head injuries. It is known 250 people were kidnapped by Al-Qaeda last week from the nearby city of Hama, which is the same number as the current body count of wounded and killed civilians.
In another “coincidence,” a Pakistani British doctor who at the time of the attack was taking interview requests instead of helping the injured who were flooding in, and additionally received gas masks from a British organization three days prior to the attack.
The doctor, Shajul Islam, is being used as a source by US and UK media, despite facing terror charges for kidnapping and torturing two British journalists in Syria and being struck off the medical register. The organization responsible for sending him equipment is under fire for using donations meant for refugees.
In another suspicious event, the White Helmets operating in the same quarry near the attack received sarin-protective respirator suits one month before the attack, even though the Syrian government no longer possesses sarin.
The al-Qaeda-linked rebels have claimed the chemical was sarin gas used by the Syrian government; however, the OPCW has confirmed Syria no longer has chemical weapons and completely dismantled their stockpiles in 2013.
In contrast, the rebels have not gotten rid of the chemical weapons at their disposal.
According to award winning journalist Seymour Hersch, intelligence reports show the rebels smuggled in chemical weapons from Libya through Turkey with the approval of Hillary Clinton.
In 2013, so-called moderate rebels had filmed themselves killing rabbits with gas and threatening to kill religious minorities. ISIS is also known to be in possession of chemical weapons having conducted attacks on Syrian forces in Deir Ezzor.
However weaponized, sarin would have killed or at least injured unprotected first responders. Sarin can be absorbed through skin and requires a full body suit; however, the White Helmets appeared to wear only masks and no gloves while they handled exposed victims. Others in the vicinity appear not to be wearing a mask at all and are yet unaffected.
Weaponized sarin is a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) capable of killing thousands. If sarin was indeed used, it must have been a weak, non-weaponized form.
Unsurprisingly, the mainstream media and neo-con politicians have been quick to regurgitate the al-Qaeda-linked rebels version of the events before any investigation takes place.
In response to the allegations, the Syrian Military and the Russian Ministry of Defense denied any involvement in the attack.
NATO governments are unhappy with the Trump administration’s recent statements that they no longer see regime change in Syria as a priority. In response to this, British Prime Minister Theresa May made a statement that Britian was still fully committed to regime change in Syria. The UK and France may have seen a staged chemical attack as an opportunity to push Trump into war with Syria.
The chemical attack came at the same time as another media attack was occurring against the Syrian government, which claimed that Syrian hospitals were in fact secret torture “slaughterhouses.”
The last chemical attack false flag attack occurred in 2013, where the Syrian Army was accused of using the WMD on the same day the Syrian government had invited weapon inspectors into Damascus, which resulted in Syria giving up its chemical weapons.
In the near future neocons may accuse Syria of failing to give up all chemical weapons, in spite of assurances by the OPCW. This is what happened to Iraq in 2003, which was invaded despite surrendering their chemical weapons in the 1990s.
No one questions how the Syrian government could possible use a weapon it doesn’t have, nor what motive it could possibly possess.
For the moment however, the narrative being pushed by neo-cons is “Trump should do what Obama failed to do, bomb Syria for al-Qaeda” and it seems that narrative is winning.
“CBS News came dangerously close to admitting what we already knew: The Garland, TX attack was a FBI sponsored false flag event” – Kurt Haskell on Facebook
“There is some sort of behind the scenes intelligence battle going on.” – Kurt Haskell in answering why ’60 Minutes’ is reporting this now
• • •
From: CBS News
… The following is a script from “Attack in Garland,” which aired on March 26, 2017. Anderson Cooper is the correspondent. Graham Messick and Steve McCarthy, producers. Jack Weingart, associate producer.
… In looking into what happened in Garland, we were surprised to discover just how close the FBI was to one of the terrorists. Not only had the FBI been monitoring him for years, there was an undercover agent right behind him when the first shots were fired.
The target of the attack was an event taking place in this conference center on May 3, 2015. A self-described free speech advocate named Pamela Geller was holding a provocative contest, offering a cash-prize for the best drawing of the prophet Muhammad, whose depiction is considered sacrilege by some Muslims. …
The next day as the FBI picked through the crime scene, the evidence showed Garland police had prevented a massacre. The terrorists brought six guns, hundreds of rounds of ammunition, bulletproof and tactical vests, and Xeroxed copies of the black flag of ISIS. They were identified as 31-year-old Elton Simpson and 34-year-old Nadir Soofi. Just hours before the attack they had sent this tweet pledging allegiance to ISIS. But Simpson was already well-known to the FBI. …
But at the time of this interview, Simpson had already become interested in radical Islam, and the Phoenix FBI, which was investigating one of his friends, hired an informant, a Sudanese refugee named Dabla Deng, to check Simpson out.
Anderson Cooper: There are informants inside the mosque?
Usama Shami: Yeah. I mean the whole case with Elton Simpson was with an informant that he was befriending Elton and taping his conversations.
Dabla Deng spent three years pretending to be Simpson’s friend, and was paid $132,000 by the FBI. He taped more than 1,500 hours of their conversations and finally recorded him talking about traveling overseas to wage jihad. Simpson lied to the FBI about it and got three years probation. …
Seamus Hughes: It speaks to a larger problem the FBI has, which is you have an individual who pops into your radar in 2006, but doesn’t commit an attack until 2015. So do you want the FBI to watch this individual for nine years? …
He was found guilty on multiple counts and sentenced to 30 years in prison. But his attorney Dan Maynard continued to investigate, and uncovered new evidence the FBI was much closer to the Garland attack than anyone realized. …
Dan Maynard: That’s right. Yeah. After the trial we found out that they had had an undercover agent who had been texting with Simpson, less than three weeks before the attack, to him “Tear up Texas.” Which to me was an encouragement to Simpson.
The man he’s talking about was a special agent of the FBI, working undercover posing as an Islamic radical. …
But it turns out the undercover agent did more than just communicate online with Elton Simpson. In an affidavit filed in another case the government disclosed that the FBI undercover agent had actually “traveled to Garland, Texas, and was present… at the event.”
Dan Maynard: I was shocked. I mean I was shocked that the government hadn’t turned this over. I wanted to know when did he get there, why was he there?
And this past November, Maynard was given another batch of documents by the government, revealing the biggest surprise of all. The undercover FBI agent was in a car directly behind Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi when they started shooting. This cell-phone photo of school security guard Bruce Joiner and police officer Greg Stevens was taken by the undercover agent seconds before the attack. …
Dan Maynard: I can’t tell you whether the FBI knew the attack was gonna occur. I don’t like to think that they let it occur. But it is shocking to me that an undercover agent sees fellas jumping out of a car and he drives on. I find that shocking.
Anderson Cooper: That he didn’t try to stop–
Dan Maynard: He didn’t try to stop ‘em. Or he didn’t do something. I mean, he’s an agent, for gosh sakes. …
Seamus Hughes: … And in most of the cases, you see the FBI has some touchpoint with those individuals beforehand.
Kurt’s analysis of Sandy Hook is especially interesting @ 39:25
Fort Lauderdale drill @ 36:25
Kurt Richard Haskell, “Underwear Bomber Witness”, was on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253, the target of a failed al-Qaeda bombing attempt on Christmas Day, December 25, 2009. Talking with Rachael L. McIntosh and Rob Ossell of http://www.shadowcitizen.ONLINE (02.15.17), Kurt discussed how to spot a ‘false flag’ – which is a covert operation designed to deceive in such a way as to appear as though it is being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed it.
KURT’S LIST how to determine if you are presented with a False Flag Event
1. The perpetrators have had recent arrests and have gotten very lenient sentences for what they were charged with.
2. The government has been warned of the attack and done nothing to stop it.
3. Eyewitness accounts differ on key details from the official version.
4. The perpetrators don’t go to trial (dead or escape).
5. A victim from the crime that should have been killed miraculously lives to give out details of the event.
6. Key video is hidden. Still pictures, which are often grainy or unclear are released to support the official story.
7. The perpetrators are tied to ISIS or Syria.
8. The perpetrators are identified in record time.
9. Dropped identification of the perpetrators is found.
10. DNA from the perpetrators is found in too many places and is run through lab tests in record time to make an identification.
11. The attack was on or in public transportation.
12. The amount of dead shrinks as the event plays out.
13. New laws or military action take place as a result of the event.
14. The event receives an abnormal amount of press coverage.
15. The country where the event took place has recently irritated Israel in some way.
16. The event and perpetrators are set up to cause conflict between several different religious, ethnic or sexual orientation groups.
17. The term “assault rifle” is widely used to describe the perpetrators weapon by eyewitnesses.
18. The friends and family of the victims do interviews that are not believable.
19. Suicide vests are used and at least one doesn’t detonate.
20. One or more bombs do not detonate.
21. A gun jams, thereby saving someone from death.
22. An unbelievable hero story is released by the press on day two, usually accompanied by a gofundme account.
23. A manifesto is released by the perpetrators.
24. A drill is taking place at or near the event at the same time.
25. The US Government gives an incredible amount of money to the victims families.
26. Obama appears at a funeral for the victims
27. Little to no amateur cell phone video footage of the event is released.
28. The perpetrators have recently disappeared for at least two months.
29. An online video is found of the perpetrator acting crazy.
30. The details of the event make it impossible to not be reminded of other recent false flag events.
31. Friends and family members suddenly change careers to become professional anti-gun lobbyists.
32. The perpetrators wore body armor or it is found at the scene.
33. Former military members play key roles in the event in some way.
34. There is little to no proof that anybody died or was injured.
35. Federal agencies are on the scene in record time and numbers that would not normally be possible In a short time period without prior knowledge.
36. Federal agencies take over the scene even though it is an event not normally under their jurisdiction.
37. Rita Katz and S.I.T.E. immediately “find” evidence that ties the perpetrators to radical Islam.
38. No tears are shed by family members in the immediate aftermath of the event.
39. Footage from other events is passed off as actual video from this event.
40. Unverifiable social media posts pop up immediately after the event to point the finger at the perpetrators.
41. Witnesses indicate at least one perpetrator said “Allahu Akbar.”
Kurt Haskell UNBLOCKED What is a False Flag Event? Overview by Survivor