This audio interview at Spingola Speaks is even more amazing and comprehensive than the article linked below. Hitler tried many times (probably dozens) and in every way possible to offer peace to avoid war (before and during)!:
Mark R. Elsis
What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers, 1933-1939 – Time to face the facts!
Beginning well before 1939 and continuing right through to the present day, world opinion has been systematically manipulated to induce the false belief that Adolf Hitler was a power mad, despotic war monger and evil tyrant who had illegally seized power in Germany, sought war with his European neighbours, and had a plan to rule the world. The establishment “court historians” have maintained and perpetuated this propaganda narrative since 1945, while skilfully ignoring Hitler’s numerous well documented attempts to persuade the World War I Allies, through diplomatic means, to live up to their own commitments to disarm, and to work with him to bring about a just settlement of outstanding issues arising out of the Treaty of Versailles, which had severely crippled Germany (and consequently also the world economy) as well as, caused persistent growing tensions within Europe, were repeatedly rebuffed.
This article from 1940 by Dr. Friedrich Stieve provides an overview of Hitler’s various peace initiatives from the time he was first duly appointed as Chancellor in 1933 until war was declared on Germany in 1939. It demonstrates clearly how these efforts at preserving world peace were thwarted by British, French, American and Russian war mongers and their string pullers, the International Bankers who had an entirely different agenda to which Hitler’s proposals and his model of National Socialism posed a huge threat. Thus, they declared that “Hitler was a menace to the world and must be stopped!”, employing atrocity propaganda, false quotes, or quotes taken out of context, and disinformation to propagate and perpetuate their own narrative, to incite nations to war, and to always shift the blame away from themselves. And of course, they also smeared those who supported Hitler or who at least, who found his foreign policy objectives not unreasonable, as “appeasers”. Then, having succeeded in destroying Germany, they buried evidence which challenged their narrative, created false evidence, and tortured Germans into making false, self-incriminating confessions, etc to establish their (the victor’s) version of events as official history, and their war as completely justified and necessary; the so-called “good war”.
Since 1945, this false paradigm has been perpetually recycled as the proponents of the New World Order agenda continue to brand all truly nationalistic leaders who serve their people (and not the Bankers) as “the next Hitler” or as “Nazi like”, etc. and of course, those who support them are again labelled as “appeasers” or “cowards”, or even as “terrorists”. It is time for the world to wake up, face the facts, and recognize this ‘method of operations’, and to understand that it was first developed and used against Germany in World War I, and then refined and perfected in World War II into a hideous art form, with which they always drive the “sheeple” to do their bidding.
Published in 1940 by the Washington Journal under the auspices of the ‘Deutsche Informationsstelle’, by Dr. Friedrich Stieve (Intro only)
Germany’s enemies maintain today that Adolf Hitler is the greatest disturber of peace known to history, that he threatens every nation with sudden attack and oppression, that he has created a terrible war machine in order to cause trouble and devastation all around him. At the same time they intentionally conceal an all-important fact: they themselves drove the Leader of the German people finally to draw the sword. They themselves compelled him to seek to obtain at last by the use of force that which he had been striving to gain by persuasion from the beginning: the security of his country. They did this not only by declaring war on him on September 3, 1939, but also by blocking step for step for seven years the path to any peaceful discussion.
The attempts repeatedly made by Adolf Hitler to induce the governments of other states to collaborate with him in a reconstruction of Europe resemble an ever-recurring pattern in his conduct since the commencement of his labors for the German Reich. But these attempts were wrecked every time by reason of the fact that nowhere was there any willingness to give them due consideration, because the evil spirit of the Great War still prevailed everywhere, because in London and Paris and in the capitals of the Western Powers’ vassal states there was only one fixed intention: to perpetuate the power of Versailles.
A rapid glance at the most important events will furnish incontrovertible proof for this statement.
When Adolf Hitler came to the fore, Germany was as gagged and as helpless as the victors of 1918 wanted her to be. Completely disarmed, with an army of only 100,000 men intended solely for police duties within the country, she found herself within a tightly closed ring of neighbors all armed to the teeth and leagued together. To the old enemies in the West, Britain, Belgium and France, new ones were artificially created and added in the East and the South: above all Poland and Czechoslovakia. A quarter of the population  of Germany were forcibly torn away from their mother country and handed over to foreign powers. The Reich, mutilated on all sides and robbed of every means of defense, at any moment could become the helpless victim of some rapacious neighbor.
Then it was that Adolf Hitler for the first time made his appeal to the common sense of the other powers. On May 17, 1933, a few months after his appointment to the office of Reichskanzler, he delivered a speech in the German Reichstag, from which we extract the following passages:
“Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness.
… Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention.
… Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security.”
No answer was received…. (please continue reading this fully sourced article with links below)