Talmudism: Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Kevin MacDonald on February 17, 2018

… According to Abrams, because of this vision, Jews have taken the lead in secularizing America.  In fact, the key role of Jewish organizations in shaping the Constitutional law on Church/State relations is well known. And it’s not much of a mystery who’s behind the war on Christmas.

And by successfully changing immigration policy, Jews have reduced the political power of the rural White subculture of America to the point that even though roughly 7 in 10 White males voted Republican (and ~60% of White females), Obama and the Democrats won the recent election. Even if the current push for gun control fails, we can expect that Jewish organizations will continue the push to disarm White males.

Jewish organizations are not at all against guns when they are in the hands of the police and other authorities. The ADL (see the ADL’s Law Enforcement Agency  Resource Network) and the SPLC (Law Enforcement Training and Law Enforcement Resources) have made strong alliances with law enforcement in America.

Further, it has often been observed that Jewish organizations have historically favored a strong central government rather than states’ rights.

Entire Article

(vid) The Bundy Trial and Why It Should Matter to You — Cliven Bundy and his sons have been incarcerated for nearly two years. Regardless of your position on the matter you must ask yourself how American citizens can be held so long without trial. John Lamb discusses Ryan Bundy’s recent release to a halfway house and the latest developments in the case

Continue reading “(vid) The Bundy Trial and Why It Should Matter to You — Cliven Bundy and his sons have been incarcerated for nearly two years. Regardless of your position on the matter you must ask yourself how American citizens can be held so long without trial. John Lamb discusses Ryan Bundy’s recent release to a halfway house and the latest developments in the case”

(vid) Obamacare Repeal Debate: Kimmel vs Graham vs Rand Paul! — Jimmy Kimmel wants to keep Obamacare. Lindsay Graham wants to move it to the state level with federal tax dollars. Rand Paul wants to repeal it

Continue reading “(vid) Obamacare Repeal Debate: Kimmel vs Graham vs Rand Paul! — Jimmy Kimmel wants to keep Obamacare. Lindsay Graham wants to move it to the state level with federal tax dollars. Rand Paul wants to repeal it”

(vid) States Rights? – Alaska Rep. Don Young apologizes to Washington state congresswoman – What really happened

According to the Constitution, there shouldn’t be any federal ownership of land in Alaska, so also no federal rulership of it. It’s up to Alaska to decide.

The congresswoman from Washington state thinks otherwise, as the Constitution isn’t followed much these days. 84-year-old, 23 term congressman Don Young gets upset, breaks protocol and even uses an expletive, which he knows full well is wrong. And then says he didn’t say ‘damn’ when he clearly did.

The house suspends discussion for five minutes, after which Don Young apologizes, which definitely does appear genuine, and is accepted. But will the media play the footage of the apology? No way. We an watch it here though.

Here is the entire interaction, how it really went down:

Continue reading “(vid) States Rights? – Alaska Rep. Don Young apologizes to Washington state congresswoman – What really happened”

Lincoln’s Army Raped, Pillaged, and Plundered SC: General Sherman’s Professed Hatred of Self Government — NOT because there were more slaves there than in other states, or because of anything else related to slavery.  It was because South Carolinians, even more than other Southerners, did not believe in uncompromising obedience to the central state

Why They Raped, Pillaged, and Plundered: General Sherman’s Professed Hatred of Self Government

By Thomas DiLorenzo
December 4, 2014

November and December of this year mark the 150th anniversary of General William Tecumseh Sherman’s famous “march to the sea” at the end of the War to Prevent Southern Independence.  The Lincoln cult – especially its hyper-warmongering neocon branch – has been holding conferences, celebrations, and commemorations while continuing to rewrite history to suit its statist biases.  Business as usual, in other words.  But they are not the only ones writing about the event.  Historian Karen Stokes has published South Carolina Civilians in Sherman’s Path: Stories of Courage Amid Civil War Destruction that contains a great deal of very telling information about Sherman’s motivation in waging total war on the civilian population of South Carolina.

Stokes begins by quoting a letter that Sherman wrote to General Henry Halleck shortly before invading all-but-defenseless South Carolina:  “[T]he whole army is burning with an insatiable desire to wreak vengeance upon South Carolina.”  In another message a few weeks later, Sherman reiterated to Halleck that “The whole army is crazy to be turned loose in [South] Carolina.”

South Carolina Civilia…Karen StokesBest Price: $14.56Buy New $13.38(as of 11:00 EDT – Details)

A New York newspaperman who was “embedded” with Sherman’s army (to use a contemporary term) wrote that “There can be no denial of the assertion that the feeling among the troops was one of extreme bitterness towards the people of the State of South Carolina.”  The Philadelphia Inquirer cheered on as Sherman’s army raped, pillaged, burned, and plundered through the state, calling South Carolina “that accursed hotbed of treason.”

In a January 31, 1864 letter to Major R.M. Sawyer, Sherman explained the reason why he hated the South in general, and South Carolina in particular, so much.  The war, he said “was the result of a false political doctrine that any and every people have a right to self-government.”  In the same letter Sherman referred to states’ rights, freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press as “trash” that had “deluded the Southern people into war.”

Sherman’s subordinates expressed similar opinions.  In 1865 Major George W. Nichols published a book about his exploits during Sherman’s “march” in which he describing South Carolinians as “the scum, the lower dregs of civilization” who are “not Americans; they are merely South Carolinians.”  General Carl Schurz is quoted by Stokes as remarking that “South Carolina – the state which was looked upon by the Northern soldier as the principal instigator” of the war was “deserving of special punishment.”

Lincoln Unmasked: What…Thomas J. DilorenzoBest Price: $6.00Buy New $9.96(as of 08:36 EDT – Details)

All of this is so telling because it reveals that neither Sherman, nor his subordinate officers, nor the average “soldier” in his army, were motivated by anything having to do with slavery.  South Carolina suffered more than any other state at the hands of Sherman’s raping, looting, plundering, murdering, and house-burning army because that is where the secession movement started.  It was NOT because there were more slaves there than in other states, or because of anything else related to slavery.  It was because South Carolinians, even more than other Southerners, did not believe in uncompromising obedience to the central state.

(vid) The Civil War was Not for Slavery – Prayer U Video Refuted

For me at least, the speaker is difficult to follow, since a lot of this information is new to me, and because of his speaking style, so I often stopped the video and read the quotes for myself.

Most of this makes sense. Though, I’ve often thought that tariffs were a good thing, helping domestic production and financing the government without the need for an income tax.

I hope James Perloff takes this subject on. He would take this to a new level of understanding for many.

– –

The Civil War was Not for Slavery

Published on Jan 15, 2017

The Civil War was NOT a war for slavery rebuttal to Prager University video that falsely claims the Civil War was about slavery. More stories about banning the Confederate flag and removing other history at http://ConservativeAmmo.com/RemoveHis…

The reason slavery is the popular justification for the Civil War, is that it’s the only way to excuse the gross amount of illegal actions taken by Lincoln for engaging in a war to prevent the Confederacy from having the right to govern themselves. The Civil War was an illegal war, carried out by the North to retain America’s biggest cash crops: cotton and tobacco, and to justify it, the North came up with one of the great lies of history.

Sources in video:
Prager University video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7q…

Lincoln’s Comments on Blacks in the 4th Lincoln-Douglas Debate (Page 50) http://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewconten…

http://www.amazon.com/When-Course-Hum…
http://www.amazon.com/The-South-under…
http://www.amazon.com/The-Real-Lincol…
http://www.amazon.com/North-against-S…
http://www.amazon.com/Tariffs-Blockad…
http://www.amazon.com/For-Good-Evil-I…
http://www.ashevilletribune.com/archi…
http://www.madisonjournaltoday.com/ar…
http://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Amer…

Responses to most popular objections in the bottom of description:

Comment
1, Everyone knows the Civil War was for slavery, or so-and-so expert says the Civil War was about slavery or this random guy on YouTube is not an expert

Response: Fallacy of Faulty Appeal of Authority—arguing that a claim is true because someone else believes it

Comment: This guy is a neo-Confederate, or this is the Southern Lost Cause on YouTube

Response: This is a Circumstantial Ad hominem- claiming a person is motivated to make an argument, and therefore, it can’t be true.

Most all other comments that object to the video either present evidence that was debunked in the video (because they probably didn’t watch the whole video) or are not responding to something that was said in the video